Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
2.
Chemical Senses ; 47, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2308612
5.
Rhinology ; 2022 04 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1786176

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sudden smell loss is a specific early symptom of COVID-19, which, prior to the emergence of Omicron, had estimated prevalence of ~40% to 75%. Chemosensory impairments affect physical and mental health, and dietary behavior. Thus, it is critical to understand the rate and time course of smell recovery. The aim of this cohort study was to characterize smell function and recovery up to 11 months post COVID-19 infection. METHODS: This longitudinal survey of individuals suffering COVID-19-related smell loss assessed disease symptoms and gustatory and olfactory function. Participants (n=12,313) who completed an initial survey (S1) about respiratory symptoms, chemosensory function and COVID-19 diagnosis between April and September 2020, were invited to complete a follow-up survey (S2). Between September 2020 and February 2021, 27.5% participants responded (n=3,386), with 1,468 being diagnosed with COVID-19 and suffering co-occurring smell and taste loss at the beginning of their illness. RESULTS: At follow-up (median time since COVID-19 onset ~200 days), ~60% of women and ~48% of men reported less than 80% of their pre-illness smell ability. Taste typically recovered faster than smell, and taste loss rarely persisted if smell recovered. Prevalence of parosmia and phantosmia was ~10% of participants in S1 and increased substantially in S2: ~47% for parosmia and ~25% for phantosmia. Persistent smell impairment was associated with more symptoms overall, suggesting it may be a key marker of long-COVID illness. The ability to smell during COVID-19 was rated slightly lower by those who did not eventually recover their pre-illness ability to smell at S2. CONCLUSIONS: While smell ability improves for many individuals who lost it during acute COVID-19, the prevalence of parosmia and phantosmia increases substantially over time. Olfactory dysfunction is associated with broader persistent symptoms of COVID-19, and may last for many months following acute COVID-19. Taste loss in the absence of smell loss is rare. Persistent qualitative smell symptoms are emerging as common long-term sequelae; more research into treatment options is strongly warranted given that even conservative estimates suggest millions of individuals may experience parosmia following COVID-19. Healthcare providers worldwide need to be prepared to treat post COVID-19 secondary effects on physical and mental health.

6.
Chemical Senses ; 46, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1665928

ABSTRACT

We identified associations between measured olfactory dysfunction (OD) and dietary parameters in a nationally representative sample of US adults. In NHANES 2013-2014, 3,206 adults 40 and over completed a measured smell exam (8-item odor identification test) as well as a 24-hour dietary recall interview administered by trained interviewers. OD was defined as incorrect identification of 3 or more (out of 8) odors;severe OD was defined as incorrect identification of 5 or more odors. Diet quality was assessed using the Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015), where higher scores indicate higher diet quality. Other dietary variables included 24-h energy intake, and % energy from fat, added sugar, and alcohol. Survey-weighted multiple linear regression models estimated independent associations between OD and dietary variables. Models were stratified by sex, and adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, education, income, smoking and chronic disease status. The prevalence rates of OD and severe OD were 12.8% (95% CI: 10.8%, 15.2%) and 2.5% (95% CI: 1.9%, 3.5%), respectively;the average HEI-2015 score was 52.9 (0.7 SE). In men, severe OD was associated with lower energy intake with an adjusted mean difference of -403.9 (95% CI: -710.4, -97.3) between those with and without severe OD. In women, severe OD was associated with lower % of energy intake from alcohol with an adjusted mean difference of -1.71 (95% CI: -2.5, -0.95). No significant associations were observed with other dietary variables. These findings are generally consistent with the broader view that disrupted olfactory function often has meaningful dietary implications, a concern with increased public health relevance given the transient and persistent olfactory disruption observed with COVID-19 infections.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL